Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions - Spinal DISC Center | Kris Radcliff, MD | New Jersey
Dr. Kris Radcliff specializes in simplifying the management of complex spine conditions and traumatic spine injuries, focusing exclusively on spine surgery, with particular expertise in the area of artificial disc replacement. Dr. Radcliff is highly experienced, having performed more than 10,000 spine surgeries. He combines conservative decision-making judgment with state-of-the-art and minimally invasive surgical techniques, endoscopic spine surgery, and artificial disc replacement.
Dr. Kris Radcliff, Kris Radcliff MD, Kris Radcliff, spinal disc center, spinal disc center new jersey, artificial disc replacement, artificial disc replacement specialist, endoscopic spine surgeon, endoscopic spine surgeon new jersey, new jersey spine surgeon, best spine surgeon in new jersey, minimally invasive spine surgery, MISS New Jersey, cervical spine surgery, cervical lamino-foraminatomy, cervical radiculopathy, artificial cervical disc replacement, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical discectomy and fusion, lumbar microdiscectomy, lumbar laminectomy, minimally invasive tlif, ALIF, kyphoplasty, SI joint fusion, facet joint injections, treatment for neck pain, treatment for back pain, treatment for cervical myelopathy, treatment for cervical radiculopathy, treatment for cervical stenosis, treatment for compression fractures, treatment for degenerative disc disease, treatment for herniated disc, treatment for sciatica, treatment for si joint disorders, treatment for spinal stenosis
16762
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16762,single-format-standard,bridge-core-3.0,wp-schema-pro-2.7.17,qode-page-transition-enabled,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-theme-ver-28.4,qode-theme-bridge,disabled_footer_bottom,qode_advanced_footer_responsive_1000,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.7.0,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-16783
 

Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions

Kristen E Radcliff, Christopher K Kepler, Andre Jakoi, Gursukhman S Sidhu, Jeffrey Rihn, Alexander R Vaccaro, Todd J Albert, Alan S Hilibrand: Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. In: Spine J, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1339–1349, 2013, ISSN: 1878-1632.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is symptomatic deterioration of spinal levels adjacent to the site of a previous fusion. A critical issue related to ASD is whether deterioration of spinal segments adjacent to a fusion is due to the spinal intervention or due to the natural history of spinal degenerative disease.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent clinical literature on adjacent segment disease in light of the natural history, patient-modifiable risk factors, surgical risk factors, sagittal balance, and new technology.

STUDY DESIGN: This review will evaluate the recent literature on genetic and hereditary components of spinal degenerative disease and potential links to the development of ASD.

METHODS: After a meticulous search of Medline for relevant articles pertaining to our review, we summarized the recent literature on the rate of ASD and the effect of various interventions, including motion preservation, sagittal imbalance, arthroplasty, and minimally invasive surgery.

RESULTS: The reported rate of ASD after decompression and stabilization procedures is approximately 2% to 3% per year. The factors that are consistently associated with adjacent segment disease include laminectomy adjacent to a fusion and a sagittal imbalance.

CONCLUSIONS: Spinal surgical interventions have been associated with ASD. However, whether such interventions may lead to an acceleration of the natural history of the disease remains questionable.

BibTeX (Download)

@article{pmid23773433,
title = {Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions},
author = {Kristen E Radcliff and Christopher K Kepler and Andre Jakoi and Gursukhman S Sidhu and Jeffrey Rihn and Alexander R Vaccaro and Todd J Albert and Alan S Hilibrand},
doi = {10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.020},
issn = {1878-1632},
year  = {2013},
date = {2013-10-01},
urldate = {2013-10-01},
journal = {Spine J},
volume = {13},
number = {10},
pages = {1339--1349},
abstract = {BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is symptomatic deterioration of spinal levels adjacent to the site of a previous fusion. A critical issue related to ASD is whether deterioration of spinal segments adjacent to a fusion is due to the spinal intervention or due to the natural history of spinal degenerative disease.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent clinical literature on adjacent segment disease in light of the natural history, patient-modifiable risk factors, surgical risk factors, sagittal balance, and new technology.

STUDY DESIGN: This review will evaluate the recent literature on genetic and hereditary components of spinal degenerative disease and potential links to the development of ASD.

METHODS: After a meticulous search of Medline for relevant articles pertaining to our review, we summarized the recent literature on the rate of ASD and the effect of various interventions, including motion preservation, sagittal imbalance, arthroplasty, and minimally invasive surgery.

RESULTS: The reported rate of ASD after decompression and stabilization procedures is approximately 2% to 3% per year. The factors that are consistently associated with adjacent segment disease include laminectomy adjacent to a fusion and a sagittal imbalance.

CONCLUSIONS: Spinal surgical interventions have been associated with ASD. However, whether such interventions may lead to an acceleration of the natural history of the disease remains questionable.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.